Wikipedia

Completing this week's task by making a small change to a Widipedia article gave me the opportunity to read their instructions and guidelines on editing. It was fascinating to see both the editing tools and how the site editors try to keep the multitude of those involved in some kind of order. For all its faults, they've done a pretty good job! I also feel that I've crossed some kind of boundary, having thought I would never ever edit a wikipedia article. It's getting a little confusing having so many usernames and passwords--every week a new incarnation. When will the IT world come up with a different way of establishing identify?
On a different note, having seen colleagues busily tweeting at the staff conference, I did revisit Twitter to look at some of their thoughts. Thanks!

Wiki week

Pressed for time this week, I had a quick look at the Bodleian Libraries wiki information page on wetpaint. My first thought (sorry guys) was that if I were to need to use a wiki regularly, I'd use a service that didn't have all those popups and maddening moving ads (I was tempted by the Gossip Girl update but resisted). I can see that wikis can be useful, especially for a particular group project where momentum was maintained, so that the wiki didn't become the electronic equivalent of the tattered pages of a ring binder. Guess I'm suffering from the equivalent of Hilary Term slump, but it's harder to get enthusiastic about doing things for the sake of doing them. I like using RSS feeds, however, and parking bookmarks in the cloud for easy access and for sharing. Meanwhile, I'll keep on.

Tweeting

Having just read a recent article in the IHT about Getting the Most out of Twitter (5.3.10--read in print format!) I was psyched for this week's Things. I found negotiating Twitter searches a bit harder going than anticipated. Setting up the account was easy, and there's the minor interest of seeing what people are tweeting about most today. Finding people or postings that I would follow? not so easy or perhaps I just need to devote more time to it. I can see the use for conferences, and I'm looking forward to seeing how #olc10 works out. If I can't get to ALA this year (very unlikely), I'll try to follow on Twitter.

Facebook and libraries

Taking the time to browse the Facebook pages of some of Oxford's libraries I was impressed with how they are using Facebook (and LibraryThing) to publicize new acquisitions in an attractive way and in some cases to create a real sense of community (Harris Manchester--I enjoyed the sense of dialogue with your users).
I intend to follow up on this with colleagues--how much time is spent adding new acquisitions and photos? Posting library announcements seems sensible as an adjunct to other means of communication (since only your fans will get these notices, and sometimes the people you need to communicate with are the opposite of fans!) I still haven't taken the step of joining Facebook personally, as it does seem only worthwhile if you put some time into it regularly, but perhaps I'm changing my mind about an institutional page.